• Before the Hot Big Bang there were no photons, there was light, and there was no “speed of light” limit or constraints.
• After the Hot Big Bang, the Universe was defined by Einstein’s Theory of Special Relativity:
Energy = mass x (speed of light)^2
E = mc^2
• What happened during the Hot Big Bang that converted Energy into mass?
• The Particle-Wave Duality Theory tells us that all of the Fundamental Particles that were created during the Hot Big Bang have a wave characteristic.
• The Fundamental Particles can be characterized as follows:
“Quantum is a discrete quantity of energy proportional in magnitude to the frequency of the radiation it represents.”
• What if “E = mc^2” is thought of as “Energy becomes a mass when the mass has a vibration frequency with a velocity of c^2?”
• What if the Hot Big Bang occurred after a quantity of Energy with a vibration frequency with a velocity much much faster than c^2 was slowed down from that much faster velocity down to c^2, and at that moment is when the Fundamental Particles emerged?
• Prior to the Hot Big Bang there were no Fundamental Particles, so there was no heat since temperature is the measure of vibrating “particles.”
• What if prior to the Hot Big Bang there existed a Cosmos that consisted of a non-particle substance (Apeiron*) with a vibration frequency with a velocity much much faster than c^2, and some 13.8 billion years ago there was a “quantum fluctuation” in the Cosmos such that a quantity of Apeiron had its frequency velocity slowed down to c^2 which resulted in the creation of a vibrating particle?
• What if the “quantum fluctuation” that caused a quantity of the Apeiron frequency velocity to slow down also activated a spherical chain reaction of adjoining quantities of Apeiron to have their frequency velocities slowed down resulting in the creation of more and more particles?
• What if the accelerating chain reaction of ever increasing quantities of Apeiron being converted into extremely densely packed vibrating particles is the Hot Big Bang that rapidly expanded into Alan Guth’s Inflation?
• What if some of the Apeiron had its frequency velocity slowed down to a velocity faster than c^2 such that it didn’t convert into visible particles, but into Dark Matter and Dark Energy?
• What if the Apeiron is the substance that makes quantum entanglement at speeds much faster than the “speed of light” possible?
• What if Black Holes are the condensing and accelerating of particles back into Apeiron with frequency velocities faster than c^2?
• What if the Universe is expanding from all of the visible matter being condensed and accelerated back into Apeiron in the Black Holes at the center of all of the billions of galaxies in the universe?
• What if the initial inflation wave is still propagating outwards and still converting Apeiron into Dark Energy?
• What if the merger of the last two Black Holes is the “quantum fluctuation” that initiates a new Hot Big Bang?
• What if the Cosmos is so unfathomably expansive that Hot Big Bangs occur throughout the Cosmos resulting in a Multiverse?
* Apeiron (/əˈpaɪrɒn/; ἄπειρον) is a Greek word meaning "(that which is) unlimited," "boundless", "infinite", or "indefinite"[1] from ἀ- a-, "without" and πεῖραρ peirar, "end, limit", "boundary",[2] the Ionic Greek form of πέρας peras, "end, limit, boundary".[3]
Apeiron as an origin:
The apeiron is central to the cosmological theory created by Anaximander, a 6th-century BC pre-Socratic Greek philosopher whose work is mostly lost. From the few existing fragments, we learn that he believed the beginning or ultimate reality (arche) is eternal and infinite, or boundless (apeiron), subject to neither old age nor decay, which perpetually yields fresh materials from which everything we can perceive is derived.[4] Apeiron generated the opposites (hot–cold, wet–dry, etc.) which acted on the creation of the world (cf. Heraclitus). Everything is generated from apeiron and then it is destroyed by going back to apeiron, according to necessity.[5] He believed that infinite worlds are generated from apeiron and then they are destroyed there again.[6]
Hi William. It's doubtful that there was a Big Bang and the universe is not expanding significantly. The redshift is not due to expansion, which is proven by the fact that there is a high redshift quasar in front of a low redshift galaxy and there are many high redshift quasars with bridges of dust connecting them to low redshift galaxies. The redshift is much more likely caused by ionization. Even the Sun has some redshifted light. I highly doubt that there's anything to so-called quantum entanglement. As for dark energy and dark matter, I believe they were made up to account for the fact that stars in the outer reaches of many galaxies move faster than expected if gravity is the only long-distance attractive force in the universe. But Charles Chandler found that electrical forces account for the observed motions, so there's no need for imaginary dark matter. And black holes are actually quasars. Mainstream cosmology has a lot of major flaws.
For your consideration:
• Before the Hot Big Bang there were no photons, there was light, and there was no “speed of light” limit or constraints.
• After the Hot Big Bang, the Universe was defined by Einstein’s Theory of Special Relativity:
Energy = mass x (speed of light)^2
E = mc^2
• What happened during the Hot Big Bang that converted Energy into mass?
• The Particle-Wave Duality Theory tells us that all of the Fundamental Particles that were created during the Hot Big Bang have a wave characteristic.
• The Fundamental Particles can be characterized as follows:
“Quantum is a discrete quantity of energy proportional in magnitude to the frequency of the radiation it represents.”
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum
• Can we state that Fundamental Particles as waves have frequencies such that:
“Frequency, also called wave frequency, is a measurement of the total number of vibrations or oscillations made within a certain amount of time.”
“When you have a wavelength (λ) and a velocity (V), find frequency by using the equation f = V / λ, or f = C / λ for electromagnetic waves.”
- https://www.wikihow.com/Calculate-Frequency
• What if “E = mc^2” is thought of as “Energy becomes a mass when the mass has a vibration frequency with a velocity of c^2?”
• What if the Hot Big Bang occurred after a quantity of Energy with a vibration frequency with a velocity much much faster than c^2 was slowed down from that much faster velocity down to c^2, and at that moment is when the Fundamental Particles emerged?
• Prior to the Hot Big Bang there were no Fundamental Particles, so there was no heat since temperature is the measure of vibrating “particles.”
• What if prior to the Hot Big Bang there existed a Cosmos that consisted of a non-particle substance (Apeiron*) with a vibration frequency with a velocity much much faster than c^2, and some 13.8 billion years ago there was a “quantum fluctuation” in the Cosmos such that a quantity of Apeiron had its frequency velocity slowed down to c^2 which resulted in the creation of a vibrating particle?
• What if the “quantum fluctuation” that caused a quantity of the Apeiron frequency velocity to slow down also activated a spherical chain reaction of adjoining quantities of Apeiron to have their frequency velocities slowed down resulting in the creation of more and more particles?
• What if the accelerating chain reaction of ever increasing quantities of Apeiron being converted into extremely densely packed vibrating particles is the Hot Big Bang that rapidly expanded into Alan Guth’s Inflation?
• What if some of the Apeiron had its frequency velocity slowed down to a velocity faster than c^2 such that it didn’t convert into visible particles, but into Dark Matter and Dark Energy?
• What if the Apeiron is the substance that makes quantum entanglement at speeds much faster than the “speed of light” possible?
• What if Black Holes are the condensing and accelerating of particles back into Apeiron with frequency velocities faster than c^2?
• What if the Universe is expanding from all of the visible matter being condensed and accelerated back into Apeiron in the Black Holes at the center of all of the billions of galaxies in the universe?
• What if the initial inflation wave is still propagating outwards and still converting Apeiron into Dark Energy?
• What if the merger of the last two Black Holes is the “quantum fluctuation” that initiates a new Hot Big Bang?
• What if the Cosmos is so unfathomably expansive that Hot Big Bangs occur throughout the Cosmos resulting in a Multiverse?
* Apeiron (/əˈpaɪrɒn/; ἄπειρον) is a Greek word meaning "(that which is) unlimited," "boundless", "infinite", or "indefinite"[1] from ἀ- a-, "without" and πεῖραρ peirar, "end, limit", "boundary",[2] the Ionic Greek form of πέρας peras, "end, limit, boundary".[3]
Apeiron as an origin:
The apeiron is central to the cosmological theory created by Anaximander, a 6th-century BC pre-Socratic Greek philosopher whose work is mostly lost. From the few existing fragments, we learn that he believed the beginning or ultimate reality (arche) is eternal and infinite, or boundless (apeiron), subject to neither old age nor decay, which perpetually yields fresh materials from which everything we can perceive is derived.[4] Apeiron generated the opposites (hot–cold, wet–dry, etc.) which acted on the creation of the world (cf. Heraclitus). Everything is generated from apeiron and then it is destroyed by going back to apeiron, according to necessity.[5] He believed that infinite worlds are generated from apeiron and then they are destroyed there again.[6]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apeiron
How The Universe Might Have Come Into Existence
https://open.substack.com/pub/william3n4z2/p/how-the-universe-might-have-come?r=1kb28q&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
An Apeiron Cycle Hypothesis (Rev. 1)
https://open.substack.com/pub/william3n4z2/p/apeiron-cycle-hypothesis-rev-1?r=1kb28q&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Chronology of the Universe:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronology_of_the_universe
Thank you for your consideration,
William Pritting
bpritting@earthlink.net
Hi William. It's doubtful that there was a Big Bang and the universe is not expanding significantly. The redshift is not due to expansion, which is proven by the fact that there is a high redshift quasar in front of a low redshift galaxy and there are many high redshift quasars with bridges of dust connecting them to low redshift galaxies. The redshift is much more likely caused by ionization. Even the Sun has some redshifted light. I highly doubt that there's anything to so-called quantum entanglement. As for dark energy and dark matter, I believe they were made up to account for the fact that stars in the outer reaches of many galaxies move faster than expected if gravity is the only long-distance attractive force in the universe. But Charles Chandler found that electrical forces account for the observed motions, so there's no need for imaginary dark matter. And black holes are actually quasars. Mainstream cosmology has a lot of major flaws.